SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT
(SARD) |
|
|
|
 |
| Volume 1, Number 1 |
December 1998 |
ISSN 1560-9839 |
|
|
1. WELCOME
Welcome to the first issue of our monthly
Newsletter devoted to Sustainable Agricultural and Rural Development (SARD). This
newsletter is part of a south-south project, financed by the Perez-Guerrero Trust Fund and
the Inter-American Institute for Cooperation in Agriculture (IICA), with technical support
from the German Fund for Technical Cooperation (GTZ) and the University of Vermont. The
Government of Guyana, through its Ministry of Agriculture, has responsibility for the
project which will be implemented by the Guyana Office of IICA. This first issue presents
the background of the SARD project, summarizes a few of the submissions of innovative
experiences in various Caribbean and Latin American countries and extends an invitation to
you to become a member of our SARD Network. Subsequent monthly issues will report on the
status of the SARD project, share information on useful Internet sites and examples of
SARD.
2. WHAT IS SARD?
SARD is one aspect of Sustainable
Human development (SHD). In its 1994 Human Development Report, UNDP defined SHD as:
..development that not only generates economic growth but distributes its
benefits equitably; that regenerates the environment rather than destroying it; that
empowers people rather than marginalizing them. It is development that gives priority to
the poor, enlarging their choices and opportunities and providing for their participation
in decisions that affect their lives. It is development that is pro-people, pro-nature,
pro-jobs and pro-woman. Sustainable development of agricultural and rural areas is viewed
as a multi-dimensional and cross-generational process designed to maintain or raise
agricultural production on a competitive basis, while promoting the conservation and sound
use of natural resources and stimulating greater social equity. Sustainable development,
therefore, includes aspects which influence capacity building in institutions, provision
of credit for development (especially to women, youth and Indigenous people), management
and development of natural resources, technology development and transfer, improved access
to markets and agro-processing as crucial elements of economic and social development.
3. BACKGROUND TO
G77 SARD PROJECT
In January 1996, members of G77 countries
and China held a review meeting of the agriculture sector in Georgetown, Guyana. In the
Georgetown Declaration on Sustainable and Competitive Agriculture, the meeting agreed that
agriculture must be promoted as a complex of social, economic and technological
inter-relationships, based on the active involvement of a wide range of participants;
providing multiple and diverse opportunities for business, adding value and conserving
natural resources which, in turn, provide the basis for improved quality of life, and
thus, contributing to the social stability and sustainable human development. In addition,
delegates of the G77 sectoral review meeting acknowledged that case studies
presented at the meeting provided important lessons for promoting agriculture and rural
development. They recommended, therefore, that those case studies and additional
ones should be compiled and disseminated in ways that would ensure that they reach the key
information users for the benefit of developing countries. To this end, IICAs Office
in Guyana (Guy TCA) prepared a proposal that was submitted by the Government of Guyana to
the Perez-Guerrero Trust Fund, administered by UNDP. The proposal was approved.
Subsequently, IICA was contracted by the Ministry of Agriculture to implement the project.
4. OBJECTIVES OF G77 SARD PROJECT
This one-year project seeks to identify, document and transfer to developing countries
innovative experiences and projects in the Caribbean and Latin America which have
contributed to, or have lessons for, sustainable development of the agricultural sector
and rural communities. As many experiences as possible will be documented in brief
profiles and a maximum of 20 projects will be documented in detail, both in writing and as
part of a video documentary, for dissemination to developing countries. A web site will be
created to facilitate information dissemination and to foster discussion among visitors to
the site on various aspects of SARD.
5. CURRENT
STATUS OF G77 SARD PROJECT
IICA GuyTCA has drafted a SARD conceptual document and two questionnaires have been
prepared and field-tested. Format A questionnaire (Box 1) is a one-page profile which will
be used to identify innovative experiences for detailed documentation using Format B
questionnaire. In the preliminary phase of this project, IICAs Representatives in
Caribbean and Latin American countries were requested to submit examples of appropriate
projects for consideration, using Format A.Up to the end of December 1998, profiles had
been submitted for 24 projects in six countries in the Caribbean and five in Latin America
(Table 1).
| Country |
#Projects |
Haiti
Jamaica
St. Lucia
St. Vincent & The Grenadines
Suriname
Trinidad & Tobago |
2
1
1
1
1
4 |
 |
Argentina
Colombia
Ecuador
Paraguay
Uruguay |
1
1
9
2
1 |
|
In addition to the
countries listed in Table 1, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Bahamas, Grenada and Peru
have provided a listing of project ideas for consideration.
Summaries of selected profiles in the Caribbean and Latin America are shown in Tables 2
and 3, respectively. Submissions of innovative experiences will be evaluated to facilitate
identification of those offering insights on sustainable development.
Contact persons for those innovative projects will be requested to complete the more
detailed Format B questionnaire.
Dr Veronica Broomes will act as Project Manager and Facilitator for the Caribbean. Dr
Hector Munoz has volunteered his services to act as Facilitator in Central America. Both
persons will work out of the respective local IICA offices, in Guyana and Costa Rica.
Box 1
Format A Questionnaire used to identify examples of innovative SARD experiences and
projects in Latin America and the Caribbean.
| 1. |
Name of innovative experience
or project. |
| 2. |
Brief summary of
project/experience. |
| 3. |
Type of project, e.g.
economic, social, institutional, environmental, cultural or other. |
| 4. |
Principal sponsor of
experience/project. |
| 5. |
Date experience began and
ended. |
| 6. |
Approximate cost of
experience/project. |
| 7. |
Type of beneficiaries. And
approximate numbers.
|
| 8. |
Why do you feel this
experience/project should be documented? |
| 9. |
What lessons can we learn from
this experience/project on Sustainable Agricultural and Rural Development? |
| 10. |
Give name and contact address
(e-mail, fax, telephone) of IICA or other person willing to complete a more detailed
follow-up questionnaire (Format B). |
|
Thank you for your support! |
|
|
Table 2
Summary of examples of SARD innovative experiences in Caricom
countries. Data obtained during survey via questionnaire shown in Box 1.
Name of Project |
Type of Project |
Direct Beneficiaries |
Indirect Beneficiaries |
Areas of Impact ** |
| Econ. |
Soc. |
Instit. |
Tech. |
Env. |
| Suriname: Integrarted
Rural Community Development |
Crops, livestock, marketing,
crafts, processing, human dev., Indig. People, eco-tourism, natural resources |
250 persons |
2,500 persons |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| St Vincent & The
Grenadines: Floriculture Enterprise |
Crops, marketing, tech. dev.
and/or transfer. |
25 farmers & farmers
workers |
Unknown |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Haiti:
Kredifamm, I and II. |
Livestock,
marketing, processing. |
Rural women |
1300 men & women |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Unk. |
| Haiti: Coffee
Revitalisation Project (Proje Plante Kafe, PPK). |
Crops, marketing.
natural resources |
Coffee farmers |
20,000 persons |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Trinidad & Tobago: Women
of Goldsborough (Tobago) Processing Project. |
Processing. |
7 women |
  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Trinidad &
Tobago: Mothers in Unity. |
Crafts, human dev.,
tech. dev. and/or transfer, women. |
18 women |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| St. Lucia :
Soufrierre Marine Management Area (SMMA). |
Natural resources,
eco-tourism, coastal zone management |
Various resource
users |
2,000 day boats,
3,000 yachts, 21,000 snorkelers |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
** Econ. = Economic; Soc.
= Social; Instit. = Institutional;
Tech. = Technological; Env. = Environmental; Unk = Unknown
Table 3
Name of Project |
Type of Project |
Direct Beneficiaries |
Indirect Beneficiaries |
Areas of Impact ** |
| Econ. |
Soc. |
Instit. |
Tech. |
Env. |
| Argentina: Credit and
Technical Support Programme for Small Producers |
Human development, women,
marketing, technology development and/or transfer. |
7,800 small producers
(<25ha) |
Local labourers |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Paraguay: Strengthening
Rural Communities |
Human development |
6,000 rural families |
20,000 families |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Paraguay:
Management of Natural Resources. |
Natural resources. |
7,900 producers |
30,000 families |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Uruguay:
Project for the Diffusion and transfer of technology: Strengthening the Young Experimental
and Demonstration Unit (UEDY). |
Human development,
technology development and/or transfer. |
1,600 persons |
1,600 persons |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Ecuador: Health managment
of cattle of the Cooperative for Community Development (UCAG). |
Livestock. |
 |
   |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Ecuador: Group
production and marketing of white onions in the Cooperative Jesus del gran Poder. |
Crop production,
marketing. |
Small farmers (8
men, 4 women) |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
** Econ. = Economic; Soc.
= Social; Instit. = Institutional;
Tech. = Technological; Env. = Environmental; Unk = Unknown
6. INVITATION TO PARTICIPATE
IN SARD NETWORK
We encourage you to become a member of
this SARD Network and/or contribute to the identification of examples of innovative
experiences in SARD by completing the Format A Questionnaire (Box 1). Kindly indicate your
interest by contacting the SARD Project at IICAs Guyana Office, via any of the
following routes:
|